Saturday, November 20, 2010

Phase II: The Gauntlet

Coming off of a series of interviews lasting six hours total, I feel I've been through the ringer.  Every aspect of my past, present and future has been scrutinized from every angle, and all that's left is to wait for their decision.

The interviews were with the commercial printing company, Woodridge Press in Anaheim.  The position is in the Leadership Development Program as administered by their parent company, Consolidated Graphics.  This is a three year intensive program, meant to give its graduates experience in every aspect of the printing industry.  They seek new graduates to offer this opportunity.

The first step was a PowerPoint presentation about the LDP, CGX and WPI (Leadership Development Program, Consolidated Graphics and Woodridge Press Inc. for those of you who aren't familiar with the initialisms).  This was really the background or the structure behind a conversation with my interview coordinator about how each of these entities fits together, and why I can expect in the LDP.  This also included a very brief

This was followed by a tour around the building, particularly the sales floor and production floor.  My coordinator explained the purpose of each of the machines and introduced me to their operators.  Controlled chaos would be the name I would give it.

From there started my interviews.  These ran sequentially, and were approximately fifteen minutes each.

First I spoke with the production manager, who had been with the company for what seemed forever.  He knew the history of the business, and was familiar with every piece of equipment they had every owned.  A very low key person, he seemed more interested in getting to know me than in intimidating me.

Next up can the financial controller, who had also been with the company for a significant amount of time.  She had some excellent insights into the management structure of CGX and WPI.  She seemed most interested in the concurrent positions I have held, and how I managed to keep it all straight.

After the financial controller was an account executive who had graduated from the program.  She was a very honest (some might say blunt) person who was upfront about all of her experiences in the program and did not sugar coat any of them.  I appreciated her straight forwardness, but it was a fast shift from the two previous more laid back interviews.

Finally I spoke with another graduate of the program.  He was unique in that he had joined the program with the intention of going into sales, rather than operations or finance.  We quickly found that we had a lot in common, including our reasons for being attracted to the LDP and the printing industry.

The most challenging aspect of this rapid interview and shift wasn't filling fifteen minutes, but quickly evaluating each person to whom I was speaking and trying to determine how to communicate my experience to them in a way that conveyed my interest and enthusiasm.

Lunch was enjoyable.  We went to the Cheesecake Factory.  Having had the foresight to check the menu out before hand I ordered a Salmon dish and a small salad that I knew would be clean and non-intimidating. 

Lunch was with the interview coordinator and the last interviewer.  They shared with me their experiences with the program and we got to know each other on a more personal level.

Afterward, we went back to the office, and I went in for my interview with the President of the company.  And let me tell you, I was nervous.  I could almost feel my heart beating out of my chest and had to suppress an attack of hyperventilation -- something that has never happened to me before.  At first I was a little confused about the purpose of meeting with him; thinking it was him interviewing me I started by attempting to jump into his stories and comments with my own interview-worthy anecdotes.  These were always followed by an extended, and rather uncomfortable, period of silence.

After about two minutes of this really awkward non-flow of conversation I switched gears and took to asking him questions and processing his answers.  From there it all seemed to go a lot smoother, and I felt infinitely more comfortable.  From him I learned about his experiences with the program, why he feels that it's a good program, and how he continued to learn and grow after graduating from it.  I also learned about the functioning of Woodridge Press, and his management style.

What I came away from that interaction was a sense of trust in his leadership; something that I have never experienced resultant of an interview.  He seemed very even keel and realistic.  The comment he made that I was most taken with was that he felt WPI should not be prepared for the best of times, rather be prepared to survive the worst of times.  Rather than having the capacity to deal with the absolute highest volume he can hope for, he instead aims to keep the company breaking even despite record low volume.

After the interview he thanked me for coming in, and told me they would reach a decision in the next week or so.

And after it all, I feel I've been through the ringer more times than I can count.  Not that I did anything physically draining, but the psychological and emotional toll was great.  I will update later on the final results!

Best regards,
Beth

Thursday, November 18, 2010

Phase I: Library Saga

For my final post of the day, an update on how I am fairing with the library program.

I have completed my coloring book (to be uploaded later), and will meet with the children's librarian and the branch manager later today regarding the program.  They will no doubt ask about the intended age group, and how I plan to compensate for uninteresting or absentee presenters.

 More on this later.

Best regards,
Beth

Phase II: Interview Friday

This Friday I will have an extended series of interviews with Woodridge Press in Anaheim.  This will be the final step in the process of evaluating me for the leadership development program.

These interviews will include meeting the Production Manager, The Financial Controller, the Warehouse Manager, the President and one other individual.  For the process I will have a coordinator who will take me through the day and out to lunch.

Each meeting will be one-on-one and will last approximately fifteen minutes.  Because I wish to appear interested in learning more about the company I will prepare questions to ask each interviewer.  Though there is the possibility that they simply wish to converse with me, in case of conversation lag I will be ready with filler questions.

For the financial controller I will ask:
  • I understand that one of the benefits of being a part of CGX means central office can supply its affiliate companies with resources, including financial backing. How closely are Woordridge Press's finances tied to CGX?
  • Does the finance department enjoy the same autonomy that the other departments are offered?
For the Manufacturing manager I have prepared these questions:
  • What methods does Woodrige use to accomedate fluctuations in demand? (ie layoffs or temporary workers).
  • What factors cause or predict fluctuations in demand in the print industry?
To the Warehouse Manager I will ask:
  • What sort of inventory tracking system does Woodridge employ?
  • Does Woodridge use Just In Time inventory?
And for the president:
  • Did you begin the LDP with the goal of becoming a company president, or was it something that you grew into?
  • Do you feel that the LDP provided you with the experience and knowledge necessary to lead a company?
  • As president, how involved are you in the day to day functionality of your location? How closely do you work with corporate?
  • What is the management structure of WP? Of CGX?
To my coordinator:
  • What makes a successful associate?
  • How are mentors chosen?
  • In what ways does CGX continue to support its LDP graduates?
And, just in case that final person is the Sales Manager:
  • On what products does the WP sales team focus its efforts?
  • What methods does WP use to find new customers?
The coordinator also recommended that I research the LDP further.  I will reread any information available through their website and attempt to locate the program in the news.  I will also read about the overall industry and how it is fairing.

Wish me luck!

Best regards,
Beth

Phase III: Reference Checks

A few hours after my interview yesterday, I received a phone call from the Talent Acquisition Specialist with whom I had been working for the entire process.  She mentioned that I had performed well in the interview and they were interested in 'moving to the next step'.  In this case, reference checks.

I was surprised at how nervous this made me.  Although I have never lied in a resume or interview about my performance at a position or my duties in that positions; I have to wonder if my perception of my performance and duties might be significantly than how my previous supervisors and coworkers understood them.

They will be using a third part system; A-Check America.  Based on the information I gave them I assume they will perform two verifications an Employment Verification and Professional References Verification.  They may also perform a MERIT Character Evaluation on the basis of a 'personality test' that I took the first day I was interviewed.

I have contacted all of my references regarding this, and asked that they be honest in their reporting of my performance, strengths and weaknesses; hopefully all goes well.

They should contact me within five to eight days to inform me of the results.  Due to the rapid nature of their return call, however, I do not anticipate that these will have as significant an effect on the outcome as they may normally.

Best regards,
Beth

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

When it rains...

The prospects seem to be pouring out of the ceiling!  Well, dripping, but rather steadily.

I missed two phone calls today from prospects while volunteering at the library. One was from my coordinator at Woodridge Press with regards to the Leadership Development Program for which I am a candidate.  She contacted me to determine if I had any questions about the interview process and to give me further details on how it would go.

The second was from a company that I applied to so long ago it was before I started this blog!  The company is BowTie Inc., a publisher of hobby magazines and corresponding books.  The position is a Consumer Marketing and Fulfillment Specialist position.  Apparently they have another opening in the department for which I applied a month and a half ago.  They would like me to come in to talk (for another interview I assume) and discuss the position.

I have a few questions for them, most prominently on my mind "why were four jobs opened up in less than two months?"  With turn over rate like that, I'm a tad skeptical.  Of course with the holiday season just around the corner and the recession slowly (very slowly) becoming less of a concern, they may be considering expanding their operation.

Then again, there's always the chance that it's not a particularly desirable position.

As for Woodridge Press I am quite a bit more hopeful.  It sounds like the interview is a combination of them getting to know me and introducing me to my future coworkers.  Though I am hesitant to be too optimistic, I believe a calm-yet-positive outlook is appropriate.  They will treat me to lunch during the process, and introduce me to five people around the company including the production manager, the financial controller and the president.  It will be just me through the process (interesting, I would have thought that they'd have many more eager applicants and want to get us all through at the same time).

Wish me luck!

Best regards,
Beth

Sunday, November 14, 2010

Decisions

It looks like this week was a week for decision for me and a few others.

I was officially turned down for the position at Frito-lay.  This was a bit unexpected; not the rejection but the fact that they bothered to send me a letter about it.  Though I've unsuccessfully pursued positions since beginning this search, this was the first official communication of that rejection.

Though I wasn't terribly interested in the position, I was hoping to follow the process a bit longer to gain further experience in face-to-face interviewing.

According to the letter I was removed from the running on the basis of an online test score.  I assume this to be the situational management test.  A situation was described and five options were given.  For each option you marked "would do" "probably would do" "undecided" "probably would not do" and "would not do".  You then indicated which action was the "worst" and which was the "best".

I recall from my phone interview that I was told they were looking for someone who is very 'numbers oriented'.  They are very concerned about good sales numbers; and as a result I believe they are looking for an autocratic leader.  Someone who will do what it takes to appease the company and the customer regardless of the morale consequences for their team.

This is not me.  I believe in team building, I believe that sometimes it's important to take a short term loss in productivity in order to ensure a long term gain (ie: training an employee to complete a task rather than just doing it yourself because it would be faster).  I also believe that the best way to lead is to keep track of your team's current state and make decisions accordingly.

I answered the assessment honestly and, as it turns out, my answers were not in accordance with what they are searching for in a manager.

I am more than happy to step aside and let someone else take that position.

On my end, a decision has been made, as well.  I have elected to pursue the opportunity in Anaheim rather than waiting for the uncertain opportunity in Irvine.  This means I have a bit of a bus ride ahead of me, but I will survive.

After weighing my options, I realized a few things:
  1. This program for which I am applying is the most exciting position I have found.
  2. I don't want to miss out on the opportunity to get involved in this program because of temporal or geographic issues.
  3. It is important that I develop a reputation as someone who is decisive, determined, and willing to go the extra mile(s) for the program/company.
  4. I do not want to change positions halfway through the program.
 I know that pursuing this is the best option for me, and that if I prepare myself I will be read.

Best regards,
Beth

Thursday, November 11, 2010

Phase I to II; Decision Time

I recently had a successful phone interview with my number one target company.  At the end of the interview the interviewer mentioned that my nearest location is not hiring, however, another location in the area is.  A longer commute, but the same exciting position.  To add complication, my target location will most likely be hiring as of February.  This situation leaves me with three options:
  1. Accept the position at the less valuable location immediately and just deal with the commute.
  2. Wait until February and try again.
  3. Take the position at the far location and relocate the the closer location in February.
I will create a pro/con list for each of these options to weigh out the benefits and consequences.

1.  Accept now and deal with the commute:
Pro'sCon's
  • Immediate Pay check
  • Immediate activities
  • Start working earlier
  • The recruiter who recommended me works at this location: potential ally?
  • Not looking non-committal for changing locations
  • Start building relationships immediately
  • Be a full rotation ahead of where I would be if I waited
  • Less time for library program
  • Will need to buy a car or deal with 1.5 hour bus ride.
  • Giving up on pursuing any other offers from other companies
  • Long commute regardless of method of transportation.
  • May have difficulty getting time off for wisdom teeth issues.
2.Wait until February
Pro'sCon's
  • Bike to work.
  • Will not look flaky when change locations
  • More time to prepare for working.
  • Will not need to buy car.
  • Short commute
  • Time for wisdom teeth is guaranteed.
  • Time to get library program off the ground.
  • Time to explore other options.
  • No guarantees the job will be there.
  • No pay check for four months at least.
  • Will not know anyone at the new location.
  • May look like a procrastinator for taking the position.
  • Risk being forgotten about.
  • No immediate work (continued boredom)

And finally:
3.  Accept in Anaheim, move to Irvine:
Pro'sCon's
  • Immediate work.
  • Opens up the option to stay if I like it there.
  • Immediate pay.
  • Start off with an ally.
  • Be a full rotation ahead.
  • Eventually short commute.
  • Eventually bike to work.
  • Build relationships with people at multiple locations.
  • No extra time for library program.
  • Long commute initially.
  • May need to buy car.
  • 1.5 hour bus ride.
  • No extra time for wisdom teeth.
  • No time to explore other options.
  • May appear flaky to change locations.

Like any good comparison of qualitative data presented quantitatively, I will now perform the magic of weighting. Although each of these items is a concern, some are more relevant/salient than others. Watch, and be amazed at how clarity is achieved...

1. Accept and deal
Salient Pro'sSalient Con's
  • Potential local ally.
  • Start building relationships immediately
  • Be a full rotation ahead of where I would be if I waited
  • Will need to buy a car or deal with 1.5 hour bus ride.

2. Wait and Accept:
Salient Pro'sSalient Con's
  • Bike to work
  • No guarantees the job will be there.
  •  Risk being forgotten about.

3. Accept and Switch
Salient Pro'sSalient Con's
  • Start off with an ally.
  • Be a full rotation ahead.
  • Build relationships with people at multiple locations.
  • Long commute initially.
  • May need to buy car or deal with 1.5 hour bus ride.

Taking all of this into account my decision is...

... I need more information!

In order to properly address this situation, I need all of the information that I can at my disposal. The interviewer is expecting me to contact her tomorrow with my decision. However, I believe I may need to contact her with questions, that, contingent upon the answers I will make my decision.

So, questions relevant to my salient concerns:
1. To interviewer: None.
To myself: Am I willing to deal with a 3 hour commute every day?
To Henk: Can we afford a car?

2. To interviewer: Is there a guarantee there will be a position available at Irvine location in February?  Will I be guaranteed to get that position? 
To myself: Am I willing to deal with uncertainty? Can I entertain myself for four more months without going crazy?
To Henk: Can we continue to live on a single income?

3.  To interviewer: (already asked, the answer was an unofficial yes) Will I be able to change locations once I've begun?
To myself: Am I willing to deal with a 3 hour commute every day? Am I willing to relocate?
To Henk: Can we afford a car?

More on this later!

Best regards,
Beth

On Enthusiasm and Cover Letters

We've all done it, sat, staring at the computer screen, trying to find new words to say the same old thing,  or replacing the name of one company with another, some of us copying and pasting the same paragraphs 500 times in different orders to try to appeal to this company or that organization.

And it never works.

I'll admit to it, too.  I have literally dozens of cover letters, all minor variations on one another, saved in my job hunt folder on my computer.  Each one with the same opening paragraph:
I am writing to apply for the position of (blank) as advertised through (blank).  I am interested in beginning my career with (company) because of (attribute).  I have (qualification) (qualification) and (qualification).
 And it only gets worse from there with each subsequent paragraph either starting with "as the (job title) at (company name) I (activity)ed." or, when I was feeling particularly clever, "In my capacity as...".

Dry as dust, I would say.

It's time to change our attitude towards cover letters.  If you're enthusiastic about a position convey that enthusiasm! Still sound professional, but don't stifle your personality in the attempt!

The right way? If I knew I would be a millionaire by now (or at least employed seven times over!) but I can tell you a few things that have worked for me:

  1. Don't do chronological.  Chances are your resume is already chronological; chronological is so been there done that.  Try topical for a change.  
  2. Hone in on a few attributes they're looking for and highlight how your experience demonstrates those attributes.  Don't try to be everything, actually focus yourself in this respect.
  3. Explain why you're interested in the position and the company.  It doesn't have to be profound, but make sure it's accurate and straightforward.
Most of all, avoid saying "As (position) at (company)" at the beginning of each paragraph.

Best regards,
Beth

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Coloring Book

For my efforts at the library, I have created a coloring book to use as a supplement to my lesson plans.  When completed the coloring book will include the full text from The Blind Men and The Elephant by John Godfrey Saxe.

The completed pages are below...






Montly Update Update

It looks like I may have been a bit hasty on my last monthly update.  Almost immediately after I posted, I received three communications from Career Fair contacts.

This puts career fairs squarely in the lead.

Sunday, November 7, 2010

Monthly Update

Dear loyal reader(s?),

It seems I've hit the one month mark with the chronicles of my job search.  As with all efforts, it is necessary to review effort and progress that has resulted of that effort, so as future endeavors may be properly directed. Each method will be evaluated on how many phase II encounters it has provided to this point in time...

So here goes:
MethodPhase II Progress
Method 1: Searching Job Postings1: Interview,
no spam
Method 2: Passive Seach1 Interview
whole bunch of spam
Method 3: Networking0
Method 4: Self Employment1Potential Opportunity
at the Library
Method 5: Job Fairs1 Phone Interview
whole bunch of spam
Method 6: Imaginary Jobs1Potential Opportunity
at the Library

As you can see almost all of the "hard" methods have had approximately equal success, though when weighing the spam responses it seems that Job Fairs (when done irresponsibly) may become a waste of time.  Also Passive Search methods require constant cleaning of the email inbox to keep up with the shear number of 'respondents' who have not yet bothered to look at my resume, save to read my name and email address.

It seems that continuing to pursue job postings (on job posting boards) is a relatively fruitful method.  However my recent experiences with the library have shown that this may be a method of active job seeking that I have not yet attempted.

With these conclusions in mind, I believe that devoting more time to the library, to responding to job postings and thoroughly researching job fairs will be the most effective use of my time.

I would also like to introduce Phase I method 7: researching companies in which I am interested and 1. applying to job postings via the company's website or 2. showing up at the company's recruiting events as they are held.

Best regards,
Beth

Thursday, November 4, 2010

2.36 and 4? Cultural Education at the Library

Today I decided it was time to take matters into my own hands.  No more passive job hunting, it's time to actively create my own job!

I've always been a little resistant to networking, always thinking that "it's not what you know it's who you know" was unfair to those of us who don't really know anybody.  Of course the reason this practice exists is not to exclude unsociable people, rather it's due to employers wanting to know just who they're getting involved with before they start shelling out dough to keep you on.


I've been volunteering at the library since September, and in that time I've done a pretty decent job of keeping my head above water and mastering those tasks they set me out to do. The ladies at the library have been getting to know me as well, and they seem content with my work.

Today I decided that I would speak to the Branch Manager to find out how I could get involved in our children's programming.  I brought along my coordination resume (this being a spur of the moment decision I didn't have time to make one special) and asked her simply who to talk to.  I threw in that I had experience directing educational programming for children.

Before I knew it, we were discussing program specifics and pulling in the Children's librarian to go over the details!

I'll be hosting a cultural education program for one and a half hours every month.  The program will be everything that I put into it, and my chance to really shine!

By Tuesday I will bring a sample lesson plan, sample flyer of how to advertise the event, a press release detailing the program and an announcement recruiting the multi-cultural library staff and volunteers to participate!  So much to do!

This opens up the possibility of self-employment of another kind.  Bringing this type of programming to schools and other organizations.  It would be very similar to the International Institute's education department.  I will think of this experience with the library as being a pilot program, possibly leading to recurring events at the library and beyond.

Best regards,
Beth

Monday, November 1, 2010

Phase II: Personal Mission Statement

As recommended in They Don't Teach Corporate in College by Alexandra Levit, who is citing the author of The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, below is the work towards my "Personal Mission Statement".

Step 1: Skills I possess

General SkillsSpecific Skills
  • Communication
  • Personnel Coordination
  • Consensus building
  • Democratic leadership
  • Collaborative problem solving
  • Charismatic leadership
  • Organizational Ability
  • Reading Comprehension
  • Detail orientation
  • Microsoft Office Work
  • MS Office Excel
  • MS Office Power Point
  • MS Outlook Express, 2007
  • HTML
  • CSS
  • Word Press
  • Javascript
Step 2: Philosophical Journey
Time to sit and think about the following topics:
What are your values? What type of work would you view as a privilege to show up to? How do you prefer to work? What is success? Where do you see yourself in 10 years?

Starting with values:  Although much of my ideology is constantly changing and shifting, there are a few things that I have always considered important or valuable.  The first is the importance of knowledge and understanding.  It has often been said that one cannot have a democratic society without a well informed populace.  I believe this to be true; and believe this extends into capitalism at its core.

Equally important is expecting oneself to  be a role model.  Although I may go my entire life without anyone imitating my decisions, I cannot assume that will be the case.  If I chose to take an action it should be one that, if everyone else on the planet did the same, there would be a generally positive impact, or at least a negative impact would be mitigated.

Money and fame value very little to me.  Prestige is something for which I strive, however I seek it in the context of education or recognition for a positive impact.  I put more weight on outcomes than on effort; though I have never felt that the ends can justify the means of any action.

I believe that every single person on the planet is capable of anything.  Not strictly positive tings, either.  At it is the situations we chose to put ourselves in that define which actions we are able to choose from to take.  I do not feel that our actions are predestined by our personalities, but rather elicited through the situations of which we chose to be a part.

Continuing onto the Privilege of Employment
I would love to work somewhere that I feel is having a true positive impact on the world.  I would also feel privileged to work for a company that invests in its employees because it believes in their ability to make a positive impact on the company's overall well being.  A place that arms its employees with the tools they need to succeed and then trusts them to do it.  I hope to work with driven, creative people who are as passionate about the company's mission as I am.

Success
I define success first from the individuals' perspective, that they are allowing the organization to continue and prosper.  Second from the organization's perspective I view success as contributing to the overall functioning of society.  A good example of this would be a public transportation system.  The driver keeps the system going by shuttling people back and forth from their stops.  The system benefits society overall because people are able to get to and from their jobs, thereby feeding their families and putting capital back into the economy.

I also view success as pursuing continuous improvement of oneself.  Education is one of the main methods of pursuit in this respect.

The Crystal Ball: Myself in 10 years
In ten years, I hope to be working for a company that I enjoy, I hope to be pursuing a graduate degree and I hope that I will have contributed in a positive way to those around me.  I also hope those contributions will extend out into the general functioning of society.

Step 2: Putting it into a Personal Mission Statement:
I am seeking an position that allows for constant self improvement where I can affect positive change in an organization; which in turn has a positive effect on the overall functionality of society.

Step 3: What it all Means
I'm not certain what exactly this implies about my future career.  It gives me a good idea that the organization that I'm looking for should be one I believe in, it also brings to light that I put a great deal of importance on working in a position that is significant to the company and to the rest of the world.  Hopefully this will at least help me to filter through the results of my search.

Best regards,
Beth

Phase II: Book Review

I recently completed the book They Don't Teach Corporate in College by Alexandra Levit.  It's a book that covers all the lessons she struggled to learn as a twenty-something in the corporate world.  She covers all the hard lessons, mistakes and successes that eventually lead her to a position she enjoys in the field she loved.

I found I identified with her target audience quite nicely.  She described herself as someone who had always been successful in University, achieving high grades and expected to skip up the corporate ladder as easily as the collegiate ladder.  Unfortunately, it wasn't quite as easy as she expected.

Take Away
 There were may points in the book of which I was already aware.  For example, the importance of watching what you say, especially when it's documented in writing (something that I strive to do in this blog and my Facebook profile especially).  I'm also well aware of the importance of networking in a corporate environment.  However, there was quite a bit that I hadn't thought about before.

She recommends developing a 'corporate persona'.  Not an entirely new personality, but a more refined version of oneself to bring to work and work related functions.  Until this point I had attempted to find a company that would accept me and all of me.  In hindsight, this was a bit unrealistic.  A corporate persona should still reflect your personality, but should also show you've put the effort into showing respect to your coworkers.

She also recommends a personal mission statement; something that covers who you are, for what you're looking and how you plan to achieve that.  I will walk through this process in a later post.

One of the most interesting chapters was the chapter on accepting and dispensing criticism.  Being a success oriented person, I have noticed that I have a habit of taking criticism very personally.  She recommends that you separate the criticism from yourself; they aren't saying you are bad, rather that the action you are taking is not what is expected of you.  Actions are easy to reevaluate and adjust.  Your personality? Not as simple.  From there it's important to understand just what they are criticizing, and what actions they feel necessary.

As for giving criticism it was mostly information of which I was already aware.  Do it nicely, constructively, attack the behavior not the person.  But she also mentioned a strategy for coping with employees who, despite your best efforts, cannot accept criticism in any shape or form without falling to pieces.  She recommends treating them as though they are already exhibiting the behavior and praise them accordingly.  Someone not spell checking their work?  Say "It's wonderful that you always check your work for spelling errors. It saves me so much time!"  The idea being that having been recognized for this particular behavior this person will attempt to continue to receive praise of the same variety by then actually displaying the behavior.


Criticism
Although I do not completely agree with this assessment, it might be worth an attempt.  However, it would be necessary to proceed with caution.  There is potential that based on your praise the employee could assume their minimal efforts are enough.  When their mistakes become a serious problem and that person may need to be let go, they will view the reasoning behind their dismissal as being out of the wood work.  After all, weren't you just praising them for displaying the behavior you are now saying they were not doing in a satisfactory manner?

As with most things, I'm sure it's a situational contingency.

Recommendation
I would recommend this book to job seekers who are interested in working in 'corporate America'.  The rules may be different in other life-paths but this is a concise guidebook to a world for which we seem ill prepared.

Best regards,
Beth

Phase II: Introduction

 After the initial contact comes the interview period. This is when companies and I determine if we are right for one another.  Much like a blind date, we each go in with the rosy pictures painted by our profiles (they have my resume, and I have their website) and hopefully get past those basic facts and on into the meat of the issue.  Will I fit in their company; do we each offer what the other is seeking?

A component of Phase II is evaluating just how selective I can afford to be.  How much do those credentials that I managed to rake up in University set me apart from the rest of the pack?  What exactly do I want in a position, how much of that do they need to offer upfront, and how much am I willing to accept one, three and five years from now?

 Phase II covers interview techniques and abilities.  Although I am not convinced that every position I interview for will be the perfect career for me, I plan to approach every interview with the same professionalism and learn from every success and mistake that occurs during the process.  This will include accepting any interview and using it as a practice opportunity.  I will also keep track of questions that will help me to determine whether I will have a positive relationship with an employer.

Finally, this will cover all of Method 5: self improvement.  Because the majority of what I have been pursuing through method 5 is knowledge that will help me in the interview process, I will no longer count method 5 in phase I.

Best regards,
Beth

Phases

Due to the successes experience in my initial contacts with job hunters, it seems that it is necessary not only to track my primary search mechanisms, but also my secondary evaluations.  I am introducing the use of 'phases'.

Phase I covers the initial contact process through the multiple methods described on the visitors page.  I will continue to report on the success of these methods, the lessons I learn and the merits of each.

Success in Phase I will be defined as progression into Phase II, or the subsequent contact.  This covers interview of any type (phone, in person etc.).  I will report the many resources I use to in pursuing successful phase II; as well as the lessons I learn in the process.

Best regards,
Beth